|
Supreme Court ordered for providing option of Right to Reject, it is highly dangerous, because of most of political candidates are widely providing liquor, money, material etc., to 30% lower class people, poor of rural area, and slums of urban area for getting votes, whom are blindly voting for greed, not for electing a govt. so surely they will elect criminal, cunning, candidate. While educated, lower middle, middle, higher middle & higher class people are not voting and if they shall go for voting widely they can use this option of right to reject. While constitutional India is a secular state, but still election is totally depending upon cast system, in Muslim community, their religious imams issue their Fatwa to elect candidate of a particular party beyond any prose & cons, that is also very dangerous. In place of Right to Reject, it should be Right to recall the candidate, if he\she is unable to perform, and public of their area want to recall, that panch, sarpanch, municipal member, MLA or MP, his\her elected membership of that body should cancel.
|